The Title

 Incoherent Leadership: Contradictions at the G7 in Canada At the June 2025 G7 summit in Canada, President Trump showcased stark contradictions - as he both praised Israel’s offensive against Iran and, in the same breath, urged for “peace soon” and negotiations between Iran and Israel. This “schizophrenic” approach - advocating for war one moment, diplomacy the next - amplifies global confusion and undermines any coherent U.S. strategy. European leaders, including Germany’s Friedrich Merz and the UK’s Keir Starmer, pressed Trump for clarity on whether the U.S. intends to push Israel toward a ceasefire or simply let the conflict intensify.  Their concern: Trump’s inconsistent messaging threatens both regional stability and multilateral coordination. From Peace to Pretext Military Boasting vs. Diplomatic Hopes: Trump threatened possible U.S. involvement while expressing optimism that Iran “would like to talk” about a nuclear deal. Two Messages, One Mouth: Trump dec...

The United States has often positioned itself as a beacon of democracy and self-determination. However, a closer examination of its history and recent actions reveals patterns reminiscent of colonial and imperialistic endeavors. From territorial expansions to strategic geopolitical maneuvers, both Democratic and Republican administrations have engaged in practices that echo colonial ambitions. ​ Historical Foundations of American Expansionism The roots of American expansionism trace back to the nation's inception. The 19th-century doctrine of Manifest Destiny encapsulated the belief that the U.S. was destined to expand across the North American continent. This ideology justified the annexation of territories and the displacement of indigenous populations, laying the groundwork for future interventions beyond continental borders. ​ Military Interventions and Resource Acquisition The pursuit of strategic resources has often underpinned U.S. military interventions: ​ Iraq (...

The "American Dream" has long symbolized prosperity, democracy, and freedom. However, when U.S. foreign policies aim to export this dream, the outcomes can sometimes resemble a nightmare for other nations. Drawing a parallel to the 2001 horror film "The Others," where characters grapple with unseen realities, this article explores how the imposition of American ideals can lead to unintended and often detrimental consequences globally. ​ The Duality of the American Dream While the American Dream promotes individual success and democratic values, its application in foreign policy has been met with criticism. The belief in American exceptionalism-the idea that the U.S. holds a unique place in the world-has sometimes led to interventions that prioritize American interests over the well-being of other nations. ​ Case Studies: When Dreams Become Nightmares Trade Tariffs and Economic Strain: Recent U.S. tariffs have had significant repercussions on global economi...

The United States has long been involved in complex relationships with authoritarian regimes, particularly in Africa and Asia. These alliances often involve the exchange of arms and military support for access to valuable natural resources, raising critical questions about the ethical implications and long-term impacts on global stability and human rights. ​ Arms Sales to Authoritarian Regimes In 2022, the U.S. approved weapons sales to nearly 60% of the world's authoritarian countries. This statistic highlights a pattern where strategic interests often overshadow democratic ideals. By supplying arms to these regimes, the U.S. not only bolsters authoritarian leaders but also secures geopolitical advantages and economic benefits. ​ Case Studies: Resource-Rich Nations Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC): The U.S. has been negotiating multibillion-dollar deals with the DRC to develop its abundant natural resources, including cobalt, gold, diamonds, and copper. While these init...

Henry Kissinger, a prominent figure in U.S. foreign policy, is often attributed with the remark: "It may be dangerous to be America's enemy, but to be America's friend is fatal." This statement underscores the complexities and perceived contradictions in the relationships between the United States and its allies. Recent global events have brought renewed attention to this sentiment, particularly concerning the experiences of Arab nations, Ukraine, Palestine, European countries, and the implications of various U.S. treaty withdrawals. ​ Historical Context of the Quote The quote reflects a sentiment that alliances with the U.S. can sometimes lead to unfavorable outcomes for partner nations. While the U.S. has historically positioned itself as a defender of democracy and freedom, its foreign policy decisions have occasionally left allies in precarious situations. ​ Arab Countries and the Abraham Accords In 2020, the U.S. brokered the Abraham Accords, leading to no...

In recent years, a disconcerting pattern has emerged in U.S. foreign and domestic policy: American politicians actively seek investments from Arab nations while simultaneously enacting policies that adversely affect Arab and Palestinian communities. This dichotomy raises questions about the ethical consistency of U.S. political leadership.​ Solicitation of Arab Investments The United States has a longstanding history of encouraging economic partnerships with Arab nations. American politicians frequently engage with wealthy Gulf states, promoting investment opportunities in various sectors, including real estate, technology, and infrastructure. These investments are often portrayed as mutually beneficial, fostering economic growth and strengthening diplomatic ties. ​ Contradictory Domestic Policies Despite courting Arab capital, certain domestic policies have marginalized Arab and Muslim communities within the United States: ​ Targeting of Arab Activists : The arrest of Mahmou...