The Title

When history is written by the victors, injustice is often repackaged as self-defense. Today, as the world watches Israel’s escalating aggression in the Middle East-with Western powers applauding or remaining silent-we are witnessing not isolated wars, but the continuation of a century-old colonial project born out of European fascism, guilt, and imperial ambition. Let’s be blunt: the same Western powers who cry “international law” when Russia invades Ukraine have no such energy when Israel bombs Gaza, Damascus, Baghdad, or now, Tehran. Why the double standard? Because Israel is doing the dirty work for them. A Legacy of Manufactured War When George W. Bush invaded Iraq under the false pretense of weapons of mass destruction (WMDs), he had the full backing of the West-and the quiet blessing of Israel. That lie cost over a million Iraqi lives, destabilized the region for decades, and set a precedent: lie about nukes, wage war, and call it peacekeeping. Now, that same script is being rep...

The United States has often positioned itself as a beacon of democracy and self-determination. However, a closer examination of its history and recent actions reveals patterns reminiscent of colonial and imperialistic endeavors. From territorial expansions to strategic geopolitical maneuvers, both Democratic and Republican administrations have engaged in practices that echo colonial ambitions. ​ Historical Foundations of American Expansionism The roots of American expansionism trace back to the nation's inception. The 19th-century doctrine of Manifest Destiny encapsulated the belief that the U.S. was destined to expand across the North American continent. This ideology justified the annexation of territories and the displacement of indigenous populations, laying the groundwork for future interventions beyond continental borders. ​ Military Interventions and Resource Acquisition The pursuit of strategic resources has often underpinned U.S. military interventions: ​ Iraq (...

President Donald Trump's recent propositions to acquire Greenland and integrate Canada as the 51st state have reignited discussions about U.S. expansionism. These ambitions draw parallels to historical colonial endeavors by European powers such as Britain, France, and Spain. This article explores the motivations behind Trump's territorial interests and compares them to the expansionist strategies of past empires. ​ Greenland: Strategic and Economic Interests President Trump's interest in Greenland centers on its strategic Arctic location and abundant natural resources. He has emphasized the island's proximity to geopolitical rivals Russia and China, suggesting that U.S. control would enhance national security. Trump stated he would consider all options, including military intervention, to acquire Greenland, underscoring its perceived importance. However, Greenland's Prime Minister Jens-Frederik Nielsen has firmly rejected these overtures, asserting the island...