Why Are All Nations Allowed to Fight Occupation Except Palestinians?

The right to resist occupation is a principle acknowledged in international law, permitting nations under foreign control to strive for liberation and self-determination. Historically, many nations have exercised this right and received international support. However, when it comes to Palestinians, their resistance is often delegitimized or labeled as terrorism. This disparity raises critical questions about the double standards prevalent in global politics and the application of international law.

International Law and the Right to Resist

International law recognizes the legitimacy of resistance against foreign occupation. The United Nations General Assembly has passed resolutions affirming the right of peoples to self-determination and to resist subjugation by all available means. Legal scholars argue that Palestinians possess this right under international law, including the use of armed resistance, provided it adheres to the laws of war, such as distinguishing between military and civilian targets

Double Standards in Global Responses

Despite these legal foundations, Palestinian resistance is frequently met with condemnation, contrasting sharply with the support extended to other national liberation movements. For instance, the international community largely endorsed the struggles against apartheid in South Africa and colonial rule in various countries. In contrast, Palestinian efforts are often delegitimized, reflecting a troubling inconsistency in the application of international principles.

The Role of Media Narratives

Media portrayals significantly influence public perception of resistance movements. Palestinian actions are often framed negatively, emphasizing violence and omitting the context of occupation and systemic oppression. This biased representation contributes to the delegitimization of their struggle and perpetuates misconceptions about their right to resist.

Humanitarian Implications

The double standards in recognizing the right to resist have profound humanitarian consequences. Palestinians face ongoing displacement, violence, and deprivation of basic rights. The international community's failure to acknowledge their legitimate struggle exacerbates their suffering and hinders the pursuit of a just resolution.

Conclusion

The Palestinian quest for liberation and self-determination is rooted in principles upheld by international law. The selective application of these principles undermines the credibility of global institutions and perpetuates injustice. It is imperative for the international community to address these double standards, recognize the legitimacy of Palestinian resistance, and work towards an equitable and lasting solution.